![]() Think tank leader who claims to have given FBI info on Hunter Biden charged by. Russian troops are battling high and drunk: It’s nothing newīiden’s life expectancy - and its implications This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. “We believe the board’s work has been impactful, which is why we asked the board for input into our cross-check system, and we will strive to be clearer in our explanations to them going forward.” TagsĬopyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. ![]() “We thank the board for their ongoing work and for issuing their transparency report,” the spokesperson said. Unlike with content moderation decisions, the board’s policy advisory recommendations are not binding, meaning Facebook will not need to implement any recommendations the board makes regarding changing the cross-check system.Ī Facebook spokesperson said in a statement to The Hill that it would try to do better in the future. The board said the company accepted the request and that Facebook has agreed to share the documents with the board regarding the cross-check as reported in the Journal. ![]() The post was deemed likely to violate Facebook’s normal rules for users but was not removed.Īfter the release of the Journal’s report - among others in the series that led to widespread backlash targeting the tech giant - Facebook requested the Oversight Board form a policy advisory opinion to review the cross-checks system and recommend changes. In one example in mid-2020, Trump posted “When the looting starts, the shooting starts” in response to racial justice protests. Trump’s Facebook account was among those covered by cross-check before it was suspended, according to the Journal’s report. The Journal reported that the cross-check program included at least 5.8 million users in 2020 and at times allegedly protected public figures whose posts contained harassment or incitement of violence. The Wall Street Journal revealed information about Facebook’s use of the cross-check system to review content decisions for high-profile users as part of a recent series of reports based on leaked internal documents. Trump’s page or account had been subject to ordinary content moderation processes.” “Facebook only mentioned cross-check to the Board when we asked whether Mr. “Given that the referral included a specific policy question about account-level enforcement for political leaders, many of whom the Board believes were covered by cross-check, this omission is not acceptable,” the board wrote in a blog post published alongside its quarterly transparency report. The board highlighted concerns about Facebook’s apparent withholding of information about the system when sending the board the case related to the suspension of Trump’s account. The board said Facebook “has not been fully forthcoming on cross-check,” accusing the company of failing to provide “relevant information” or providing information that was “incomplete.” Facebook failed to provide its Oversight Board with information about its cross-check system that reportedly kept certain VIP users - including former President Trump - from facing the platform’s content moderation policies, the board said Thursday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |